Overview
Analysis of the "war on drugs" indicates that its primary objective—to mitigate substance abuse by escalating drug prices and subsequently diminishing demand—has not been realized. Instead, contemporary street drugs are characterized by both decreased cost and heightened danger.
Research Context
The operational premise of the "war on drugs" was predicated on an economic model suggesting that increased drug prices would lead to a reduction in consumer demand for illicit substances. This strategy aimed to suppress substance abuse by altering market dynamics.
Findings
- Street drugs have become less expensive.
- Street drugs have become more dangerous.
Why This Matters
The observed trends—lower prices and increased danger in street drugs—directly contradict the stated objectives of the "war on drugs," suggesting an unintended or counterproductive outcome of these policy interventions regarding substance abuse.