Bayesian Symbolic Regression for Missing Physics in Model-Based Systems

arXiv CS · · 1 min read · Engineering & Technology

Read research and analysis on Bayesian Symbolic Regression for Missing Physics in Model-Based Systems published by ICANEWS, a global research journal for emerging researchers.

Key Takeaways

  • Bayesian symbolic regression uses Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo to sample from the posterior distribution over symbolic expression trees.
  • This approach quantifies uncertainty in the recovered model structure.
  • The methodology was demonstrated on a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system.
  • A well-designed experiment in a fed-batch bioreactor case study led to lower uncertainty.

Why This Matters

The ability to quantify uncertainty in model structures for missing physics provides a measure of confidence in the discovered equations, which is not available with traditional symbolic regression methods. This could lead to more robust and reliable model development in domains like (bio)process systems, where complete knowledge of underlying laws is often absent. Understanding the impact of experimental design on model uncertainty helps optimize data collection strategies.

Overview

Research introduces an application of Bayesian symbolic regression for addressing missing physics within model-based approaches, particularly in (bio)process systems. The methodology employs Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) to sample from the posterior distribution of symbolic expression trees, thereby quantifying uncertainty in the recovered model structure. This contrasts with genetic algorithm-based symbolic regression, which provides point estimates without confidence quantification.

Research Context

Model-based approaches in (bio)process systems often contend with incomplete knowledge concerning underlying physical, chemical, or biological laws. Universal differential equations (UDEs), which embed neural networks within differential equations, serve as tools for learning this missing physics directly from experimental data. However, neural networks are characterized by their inherent opacity. This characteristic motivates post-processing using symbolic regression techniques to derive interpretable mathematical expressions from the UDEs' output. Traditional genetic algorithm-based symbolic regression, while a popular post-processing method, produces only point estimates, lacking a mechanism to quantify the confidence associated with a discovered equation.

Approach

The research addresses the limitation of quantifying confidence by applying Bayesian symbolic regression. This approach leverages Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) to perform sampling from the posterior distribution over symbolic expression trees. Sampling from this posterior distribution enables the quantification of uncertainty in the identified model structure. The methodology's application was demonstrated across two distinct case studies.

Findings

  • Bayesian symbolic regression quantifies uncertainty in the recovered model structure by sampling from the posterior distribution over symbolic expression trees.
  • This methodology was demonstrated on a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system.
  • In a fed-batch bioreactor case study, a direct relationship was observed between a well-designed experiment and lower uncertainty in the recovered model.

Research Information

Institution
arXiv CS
Original Study
View Publication
Source
arXiv CS

About ICANEWS

ICANEWS is a global research journal for emerging researchers, publishing student and emerging researcher work across all fields.